In this special essay, Tamas Kowalik, doctoral candidate in Leadership Communication, offers a cultural and contextual leadership analysis that provides insight into ways strong-man authority structures contribute to Russian aggression. Kowalik urges us to consider individual and collective approaches to leadership action and reminds us that it is never too late to start adaptive work.
My doctoral dissertation theme selection – the role of authority and dependence on authority in a strong authority context – has been determined by my mostly bitter, lived experiences in Hungary. Growing up in Hungary, behind the Berlin Wall, strong authority structures and interactions, including power, position, psychological pressure, public humiliation, judgment, scapegoating, and most importantly, the need to express loyalties to authority, have been part of my life. If not directly affected, through the stories people have told me in my environment.
People lived under oppression, both politically and mentally. It all started in schools, where oral assignments (memorizing and recalling lexical knowledge that happened in front of the class) meant extraordinary psychological pressure and often led to public humiliation. Without thinking of and developing a conscious strategy or repertoire of behavior, I tried to navigate these social interactions and structures. In these situations, most of the time, I felt intimidated and uncomfortable. Depending on the case – especially if it was associated with injustice (which often was the case), I also felt fear and/or anger. I lived in a context where people were socialized to remain silent, hold back, and depend on the authority only sharing their criticism about the authority behind his/her back. Continue reading “The price of silence: Reflections on authority and leadership” →